ARE you aware today, August 14th 2012 Mr William J. Wagener who is NOT a fan or a family member held this evernt: Support of Affidavit Concerning Criminal Conduct of Tom Sneddon – 2005 Michael Jackson Trial Mr Wagner is risking his life, his livlihood! This was streamed LIVE to the whole of Santa Barbara
Target: Santa Barbara County of California Supervisors!
On August 14, 2012, Mr. William Wagener will present to the County Supervisors of Santa Barbara an affidavit of criminal conduct committed by Mr. Thomas Sneddon during the 2005 trial of Mr. Michael Jackson. We support the effort to have a full investigation into the matter carried out by an independent special prosecutor; someone outside of Santa Barbara County.
We are outraged at the egregious misuse of power during the 2005 trial of Mr. Jackson. It is frightening to think that, in someone’s zeal to get a conviction, felonies can be committed by those sworn to uphold the law and seek truth.
He has a petition on line each time it is signed the Board member receive an alert
He presented hundreds of letters from fans around the world seeking justice to be served! Here is his youtube channel, he has dedicated that last SEVEN years to this cause
**************
Santa Barbara Press-Breaking News. Fans Claim False Evidence in 05 Jackson Trial by Prosecution!
***********
AFFIDAVIT
Of
William J. Wagener
I hereby state, under penalty of Perjury, that it is my opinion, that I carefully observed in the actual courtroom significant fabricated false evidence that Proscutors fabricated false evidence against an innocent man, and the most famous resident of Santa Barbara County, Michael Joseph Jackson. I have attended Law School, and over 400 court cases & Hearings.
And that Thomas Sneddon, gave that specific magazine to Gavin Arvizo at the secret Grand Jury indictment hearing without any gloves on and afterward sent it out for Fingerprint Analysis, and if not for the court reporter capturing the comment of a grand juror about the lack of gloves on Gavin Arvizo at the Grand Jury, it might have lead to
A conviction on fabricated evidence. Further, that a Prosecutor of more than 25 years experience does not make this mistake by accident. It is my firm opinion, that a objective jury trying Tom Sneddon for this felony, would find Tom Sneddon guilty as charged.
Furthermore this was and continues to be FRAUD ON THE COURT, because the Prosecutors have pretended that nothing felonious was done by them, and no one from the pool of the Santa Barbara County District Attorneys office, will indict one of their own. What a surprise.
Second, Mag Nicala fabricated false evidence on dates of phone calls to make it appear
That Michael may have made phone calls, but their own Prosecutor’s witness took the witness stand and stated that the Prosecutors had it all wrong, as seen on the over head projection, after it had been admitted as evidence. Prosecutors tried to remove it from Jury consideration, and Defense objected, and the Jury saw the blatant lie for what it was, just another of a long list of fabricated false evidence. It is my firm opinion that if and when Mr. Nicola is indicted by a jury of 12, they would find Mag Nicola guilty of felony fabrication of false phone contact evidence and FRAUD ON THE COURT.
Thirdly, It is my considered and firm opinion that the cooperation between the prosecutors to present fabricated evidence, to the court, and to the jury is FELONY Conspiracy, by
The Prosecutors against a man the Jury found completely NOT GUILTY of all 10 original Charges plus that last minute 4 misdemeanors. This Conspiracy and the silence of a corrupt Santa Barbara District Attorneys office for 7 years and continuing is an
On going felony and stops the Statute of Limitations from running, in my opinion. One can not escape Justice by continuing the fraud on the court, on the public.
Lastly, there appears to be many other felonies committed in the 2005 trial, that a good and honest prosecutor could find. But I am limiting this affidavit to these three, and it is
Your duty under your oath of office to see that these four do not escape true justice. It is valuable to the community to know that justice is applied equally and that none are above the law, not even prosecutors, who commit willfully and maliciously FRAUD UPON THE COURT, and felonious Fabrication of Evidence against a man, who even the F.B.I. found faultless. In my opinion, and can never be, a statute of limitation for FRAUD ON THE COURT, and wilful Fabrication of Felonies in due process of rightful law,
While the evidence is on the Court record, which it certainly is, and is NOT in dispute.
As a long time resident of this City and this County, I demand that this Board of Directors of Santa Barbara County, appoint a Special Prosecutor to review this Affidavit of my opinion, and the court record of 2005 trial of Michael Joseph Jackson, that Criminal Conduct of fabrication of Evidence of fingerprints and phone call conspiracy and the conspiracy by two or more of the four prosecutors to commit such crimes against a man the Jury found completely innocent member of the County, Michael Joseph Jackson. I suggest this board ask Atty. Susan YU to recomment an unbiased special prosecutor. I am convinced that if indicted, the 2005 Court record will be sufficient to support a conviction of Thomas Sneddon, now retired, and some or all of his three assistants who daily blodgened Michael Jackson with lies. Katherine Jackson and many others who sat through this trial of fabricated falsehoods, also suffered, and at the very least, there should be an Official appology to the Jackson family for the fabrication of false evidence and wilful malicious prosecution executed by the four prosecutors with malice afore thought.
There Can be NO IMMUNITY for prosecutors who willfully, and maliciously fabricate false evidence against a man even the FBI found no falt with. To do so, is to claim a Honor and /or Title of Nobility, making some citizens in Government service above the citizens they supposedly server, and is prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.
Delivered this day, 14 of August, 2012, in person to the Board of Directors of Santa Barbara County, California, and public meeting in Santa Maria, California, and now that the FRAUD is made known, the Statute of Limitations does start to run, and if this board of Directors fails to appoint a special Prosecutor to conduct a thorough and fair examination of the 2005 Court Record of Michael Joseph Jackson, then this board will be
In effect an accessory AFTER the Fact, because Today, you have this statement as evidence a criminal act by Santa Barbara County elected and employed officials was
Exposed and made known to you.
I, William J. Wagener, am over the age of 60 years and mentally competent and do state that the above statement is my firm opinion of criminal acts:
Committed by members of the Santa Barbara County District Attorneys Office, Mssr. Sneddon, Zonen, Mag Nicola & Auchincloss. And I state under penalty of Perjury that this is my firm opinion, and that in my opinion based a true law, natural law, common law, and Gods Law, that there is NO immunity for prosecutors who wilfully, maliciously, fabricate false evidence, nor can the Statute of Limitations begin to run until the FRAUD on the COURT is exposed, which I am doing this day, by giving you this affidavit that the above named prosecutors did at least these three felonies in combination and illegal criminal cooperation with one another. Therefore you have a duty, now that you have this statement to appoint a special prosecutor and get on with the indictment and any others that helped them fabricate false evidence to maliciously and with wilful malice aforethought bring false charges against this innocent man, Michael Joseph Jackson, formerly the owner and resident of Neverland in this County of Santa Barbara, in Republic of California.
William J. Wagener
You must be logged in to post a comment.